A distinguished scientist and data management expert who works at Microsoft said, “In 2035 there will be more ‘face-to-face’ (‘virtual,’ but with a real feel) discussion in digital spaces that opens people’s minds to alternative viewpoints.” Krüger, S. (2017b). Dropping depth hermeneutics into psychosocial studies – A Lorenzerian perspective. The Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 10(1), 47–66. Hansen, M. B. N. (2000). Embodying technesis. Technology beyond writing. University of Michigan Press. Peter B. Reiner, professor and co-founder of the National Core for Neuroethics at the University of British Columbia, proposed the creation of “Loyal AI,” writing, “As artificial intelligence comes to encroach upon more and more aspects of our lives, we need to ensure that our interests as humans are being well-served. The best way for this to happen would be the advent of ‘Loyal AI’ – artificially intelligent agents that put the interests of users first rather than those of the corporations that are developing the technology. This will require wholesale reinvention of the current rapacious business model of surveillance capitalism that pervades our digital lives, whether through innovation or government regulation or both. Such trustworthy AI might foster increased trust in institutions, paving the way for a society in which we can all flourish.” Alongside this, Jenny leads on the 1:1 iPad strategy across the MAT and is passionate about technology complementing and enhancing teaching and learning both academically and in developing purposeful life skills.

In most cases, I think I probably involve myself in more STEM at school through EBS Robotics extra-curricular activities than any other subject. I have learned so much since I started participating in Year 7. Robotics is my favorite subject at school. Stephen is an honorary member of the Robotics Education & Competition (REC) Foundation STEM Hall of Fame. He has also received numerous awards, including Digital Design and Technology Teacher of the Year, VEX Robotics Teacher of the Year and he is VEX World Mentor of the Year.He has also set up the first all-girls Robotics Teams, who have competed both nationally and internationally as well as host training and CPD events of their own as students for teachers across London. Chapter 1: How Do We Make Sense of Digitizing Cultures? Some Ways of Thinking through the Culture–Technology Matrix Cutting through the vast—and often contradictory—literature on these topics, Reed avoids both techno-hype and techno-pessimism, offering instead succinct, witty and insightful discussions of how digital communication is impacting our lives and reshaping the major social issues of our era. The book argues that making sense of digitized culture means looking past the glossy surface of techno gear to ask deeper questions about how we can utilize technology to create a more socially, politically, and economically just world. Hollway, W. (2006). Paradox in the pursuit of a critical theorization of the development of self in family relationships. Theory and Psychology, 16(4), 465–482. Johanssen, J. (2018a). Gaming–Playing on social media: Using the psychoanalytic concept of “Playing” to theorize user labour on facebook. Information, Communication & Society.

Semerene, D. (2016). The female target: Digitality, psychoanalysis and the gangbang. CM: Communication and Media. Special issue. Digital media, psychoanalysis and the subject , 38(11), 217–242.Johanssen, J., & Wang, X. (2021). Artificial intuition in tech journalism on AI: Imagining the human subject. Human-Machine Communication, 2, 173–190. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.2.9

Pelletier, C. (2005). Reconfiguring interactivity, agency and pleasure in the education and computer games debate – Using Žižek’s concept of interpassivity to analyse educational play. e-Learning, 2, 317–326. A fundamental reorientation around these new types of spaces – one in which we impose shared values for these types of shared spaces – will be necessary, but the multiplication of opportunities to interact with friends, neighbors and strangers across the world may have the salutary effect of helping us to be better citizens of these digital spaces and thereby improve them without necessarily changing the fundamental technologies and structures on which they rely.” Bainbridge, C., & Yates, C. (2011, Eds.). Therapy culture/culture as therapy. Special edition. Free associations: Psychoanalysis and culture, Media, Groups, Politics, 62, http://freeassociations.org.uk/FA_New/OJS/index.php/fa/issue/view/5Mark Deuze, professor of media studies at the University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, wrote, “The foundation of digital life in 2035 will be lived in a mixed or cross-reality in which the ‘real’ is intersected with and interdependent with multiple forms of augmented and virtual realities. This will make our experience of the world and ourselves in it much more malleable than it already is, with one significant difference: By that time, almost all users will have grown up with this experience of plasticity, and we will be much more likely to commit to making it work together.” Carly Graham - Curriculum Lead, Senior Leader, PE Lead & Year 4 teacher, St John Fisher Primary School However, those yet to be connected remain cut off from the benefits of this new era and remain further behind. Many of the people left behind are women, the elderly, persons with disabilities or from ethnic or linguistic minorities, indigenous groups and residents of poor or remote areas. The pace of connectivity is slowing, even reversing, among some constituencies. For example, globally, the proportion of women using the internet is 12 per cent lower than that of men. While this gap narrowed in most regions between 2013 and 2017, it widened in the least developed countries from 30 per cent to 33 per cent.