It does feel like a double standard, a little bit," Stone continued. "We weren't willing to change the content, but also it doesn't ruin the game - it's like 40 seconds' worth of the whole game. As long as we could make a joke out of the fact that they made us cut this, that was fine." O'Brien, Lucy (June 15, 2015). "E3 2015: South Park: The Fractured But Whole Announced". IGN. Archived from the original on June 16, 2015 . Retrieved June 15, 2015. Reeves, Ben (October 21, 2016). "Don't Forget To Bring A Buddy – A Look At South Park: Fractured But Whole's Allies". Game Informer. Archived from the original on November 21, 2017 . Retrieved November 21, 2017.

a b Brown, Billy; Ballard, Jason (April 16, 2015). "Gamer Buzz: South Park Meets Santa's Little Helper". Paste. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016 . Retrieved December 18, 2015. Millian, Mark (December 1, 2011). " 'South Park' console game to debut next year". CNN. Archived from the original on June 18, 2012 . Retrieved April 6, 2014. Dring, Christopher (January 15, 2015). "Revealed: The 100 best-selling games of 2014 in the UK". MCV. Archived from the original on January 20, 2015 . Retrieved January 15, 2015.Griffiths, Eric (June 21, 2007). "Young offenders". New Statesman. Archived from the original on February 6, 2013 . Retrieved May 3, 2009.

Nicholson, Max (November 14, 2013). "The Console War is Coming..." IGN. Archived from the original on November 14, 2013 . Retrieved November 14, 2013. IGN said that the difference between character classes such as Thief and Jew were disappointingly minimal, offering little variety or incentive to replay as another class. [4] IGN also said some missions and side quests were tedious, and were elevated by their setting rather than their quality, [5] while the reviewer thought the environmental puzzles were a clever option for avoiding combat and were rare enough to be enjoyable when available. However, GameSpot said the puzzles felt scripted and simple. [19] [97] Reviewers said that many of the gameplay functions and controls were poorly explained, making them difficult to activate; others were critical of excessive loading times upon entering new locations and slow menus such as the Facebook panel. [4] [18] [98] Sales [ edit ] THQ Joins Forces with South Park Digital" (Press release). THQ. December 1, 2011. Archived from the original on October 24, 2013 . Retrieved December 2, 2011.Reeves, Ben (August 22, 2013). "Ubisoft Has The Funniest Game At Gamescom". Game Informer. Archived from the original on October 8, 2013 . Retrieved March 30, 2014. Stone and Parker worked closely with Obsidian on the project, sometimes having two-to-three-hour meetings over four consecutive days. They worked with Obsidian until two weeks before the game was shipped. [40] Their involvement extended beyond creative input; their company initially financed the game, believing that a game based on the controversial television show would struggle to receive financial support from publishers without them placing restrictions on the content to make it more marketable. The initial funding was intended to allow Obsidian to develop enough of the game to show a more complete concept to potential publishers. [40] In December 2011, THQ announced that they would work with Obsidian on South Park: The Game, as it was then known. [44] This partnership developed into a publishing arrangement after South Park owner Viacom, having grown wary of video games, cut its funding. Obsidian was aware when it signed with THQ that the latter was experiencing financial difficulties. [40] Fletcher, JC (March 14, 2012). "Court approves THQ asset sales". Joystiq. Archived from the original on June 9, 2013 . Retrieved January 24, 2013.