As to explosives offences in general, prosecutors should consider whether or not the conduct causes a clear risk to public safety. If so, . A prosecution may not be required in cases where there has been a technical contravention, through oversight or misunderstanding, and in the absence of a risk to public safety. Selection of charges

consider ESA 1883 charges or charges contrary to section 28, 29, 30 or 64 Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (explosives offending involving grievous bodily harm, caused or intended – or other intent contrary to the Act) Dalton believes that a combination of these two smells released into a crowd would cause panic. She said: 'If these were released, they would clear an area in seconds.' I'm going to tell my neighbour about the plan as he spends time outside during the day too. Though he's smelt the cannabis smoke as well as my friend further down the road. So hopefully he'll understand.I'm already photographing, videoing the doors open, and have gotten footage of them smoking by and in the building. I've reported all the problems to all the right people. At least with the noise, whilst distressing and preventing me from enjoying my property, I can stand the noise for a brief moment to enjoy the sight of my garden. The cannabis fumes however prevent me from not only going outside, but also from even opening my kitchen window, as otherwise I'll end up with a splitting headache. whether the explosives were handled and stored responsibly and with care or whether their storage was hazardous Section 9 of the ESA 1883 provides the definition of “explosive substance”. This includes “any materials for making any explosive substance; also any apparatus, machine, implement, or materials used, or intended to be used, or adapted for causing, or aiding in causing, any explosion in or with any explosive substance; also any part of any such apparatus, machine, or implement.” “Explosive” is not defined in the legislation.

They've been told to keep the fire exit doors shut by the letting agent and the environmental health officer. They say they'll keep them shut to these people, then will open the doors and keep them open throughout the day. Having experience of someone else who was like this, I know that sometimes the only way to get them to listen isn't with words but actions. For instance my ex fiance, when he was lodging with me left bread crumbs all over the kitchen, despite me asking him nicely to clean up after himself. He'd say he would but never did. The only time he did start cleaning up after himself was when I put his bread crumbs in his bed. This applies to non-terrorist offending. Potential Terrorism Act offences would fall to the Counter Terrorism Division to consider.The US army dismisses such concerns, saying they are trying to find one smell that works across the globe and that a repulsive odour could drive away the enemy without killing anybody. Expert evidence should only seek to assist with specialist knowledge and information outside the knowledge of the tribunal of fact. Proof of the offence may come, in part, from what non-expert witnesses have observed. Highly exceptionally it may come solely from non-expert witnesses where it is established that an expert cannot assist with specialist knowledge and information and where the non-expert evidence provides sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction. Prosecutors should make clear in such highly exceptional cases the position as to expert evidence in their application for consent, liaising with the AGO as appropriate prior to submission of the application. Consent applications must explain the prosecutor’s position on the question of expert evidence. In threshold test cases, this includes on what basis it is said there are reasonable grounds to suspect the person to be charged has committed the offence alleged, and what further evidence is likely to be available within a reasonable time. This will ordinarily involve providing at least preliminary expert evidence with the application. Lawful object Alternative offences, set out below, provide for their own definition of what an “explosive” (or other prohibited article) is. Expert evidence When reviewing a case where the defence of lawful object on the basis of personal experimentation, self-education or similar, prosecutors should consider the evidence: for offending involving the possession, making or storage of explosive substances, see the Manufacture and Storage of Explosives Regulations 2005 and the Explosives Regulations 2014 made under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 – see section 33 for offences and note the CPS role may depend on whether the Health and Safety Executive or the police investigate

When applying section 6 of the Code for Crown Prosecutors, prosecutors may wish to consider the following, in particular when considering which charges reflect the seriousness and extent of the offending, give the court adequate powers to sentence and enables the case to be presented in a clear and simple way.Dalton said: 'It's very pungent... more precisely, it smells like shit, but much, much stronger. It fills your head. It gets to you in ways that are unimaginable. It's not something you are likely to come across in the real world.' Ed Hammond of the Sunshine Project, which campaigns against the misuses of biotechnology, said: 'It appears these weapons cross a dangerous line and appear to be tantamount to developing some kind of ethnic weapon. '

given the obvious risks with using explosive substances, any experimentation involving them which gives rise to a risk of harm to other people or their property, or other unlawfulness such as causing a public nuisance, will not be capable of coming within the scope of the lawful object defence.” In R v Wheatley[1979] 1 WLR 144 it was held that “explosive” for the purposes of the 1883 Act should be construed in light of the meaning provided for by section 3 of the Explosives Act 1875: for explosive precursors, see sections 3A to 3C Poisons Act 1972 (maximum penalty on indictment 2 years’ imprisonment but penalties vary depending on the provision) Best answer: If you can see them, or at least see the open doors, can you record them in some way, say with photos (with date and time stamps) or on video? Then you will have something to show to the letting agents / EHOs. I would also log each breach in writing.

the risk of harm to persons or property from the possession of explosives, whether or not this materialised for the possession of fireworks at a musical event, see section 134 of the Policing Act 2017 (summary only offence). The other odour which produced the desired results was known as 'Who Me?' - a collection of sulphur molecules that stank of rotting carcases and spoilt food. One question she was trying to answer was whether there were different cultural reactions to bad smells. She tested the odours on five ethnic groups. She found that two smells transcended cultural barriers: one is called US Government Standard Bathroom Malodour, a horrendously concentrated stink of human faeces.