NinjaGaijin: go here https://www.kabusa.com/frameset.htm?/m1200.htm, Under Headshells, look for HS Washers. In return, please consider naming your firstborn after me.

have been using the Jico version for about a month and while it doesn't hold the vinyl as well as the Shure for mixing/scratching, and there's a bit too much low end, other than that the sound it good overall it's a solid substitute. in summary, dont bother with the cheaper Tonar - Jico models are an excellent alternative to the Shure originals It does sound awfully quiet compared to https://soundcloud.com/user-660295751 these recordings for e.g. .... what'u guys think? Do you happen to know whether cantilever modifications are required when switching between Shure and Jico? In addition, the output voltage is 9.5 V if I'm not mistaken, and you can see the difference with gains.

My preconception was that the M44-7 would produce an inflated bass in comparison with the others, but that is not the case. I think it may be due to to the smaller cantilever of the M75 and V15III, which can trace complex stereo grooves better. The M44, and come to that the M3 and M33 series, are much better at mono, shellac and very good with 45rpm singles. But the Shure M75C is really good with 45s as well.

Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd. is a subsidiary of Meta Platforms, Inc. based in the USA. It cannot be ruled out that your data collected by Facebook will also be transmitted to the USA.I agree that the three styli give very similar results. For my taste the G sounds slightly more refined (maybe more restrained) than the others. I know that frequency response is not the only factor to consider, but I thought it would be interesting to compare the three files for frequency, analyzing the whole file in each case. being stiffer, and jumping more, you need more weight, and and test scratching with them heavier, they seem to burn/wear the record noticeably faster Finally what I like least is the look (not really important) is the sound you are looking (well I think). Historical Note: In 2003, Shure Incorporated was awarded the National Academy of the Recording Arts and Sciences Technical GRAMMY, awarded to individuals and/or companies that have made outstanding contributions of technical significance to the recording industry. If these exist, https://www.turntablelab.com/products/jico-n-44g-improved-replacement-stylus-for-shure-m44g-192-44g-imp ; https://lptunes.com/products/jico-replacement-shure-n-44g-improved-stylus , I might be interested in getting one, as it seems to be the closest match to Shure's M44G.

Together with an old-fashioned Idler drive - very dynamic, lively sound with substance and stable imaging. Correlates to mounting in a DUAL 1019 drive. Also I'm really sorry to hear you had skipping and issues with volume and EQ.. I think that this shouldn't be an issue if you turn your speakers down - ideally they shouldn't be aimed at the styli, and also you might want to consider taking the turntables out of the coffins and try to isolate them a bit. But agreed, we didn't have these troubles with N44G/N447 Shure... it's sad that no one can do what Shure did apparently. LP Gear sells 2 for that price, or just one? How come they still have SHUREs, last of the last kind of thing, or? It's hard to believe that the M44-7 in the centre of the front row was my first one, bought new in December 1975 when I was still at school. It's still in daily use for 78rpm duty.realy good sound for budget price. more slam than EJ and ED, good second hand buy if you can get one made in USA. The M31 and M32 and the Pacific M73PE shown here, shared the M44/55/V15I body, but in a different housing. I cut away the front of the left one to fit an N44-7 stylus.