When it comes to heat, this Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i9-11900K CPU benchmark comparison is pretty lopsided. Power consumption and heat go hand in hand, and Intel's Core i9-11900K consumes more power than any of the company's previous mainstream processors. In fact, we recorded a peak of 295W during an AVX-512 Prime95 test. Zen 3 is a feature of the AMD 5000 series CPUs. AMD Ryzen 9 models from that series will be equipped with Zen 3 architecture. Earlier series will feature previous generations of Zen architecture. Can I use an AMD 5000 Series Ryzen 9 CPU on a 400 Series motherboard? But favoring higher single core benefits both designer's chips and I recommend it for Intel as well. Just as it is with desktops, at the heart of every laptop computer is a central processing unit (CPU), commonly called a processor or a chip, that's responsible for nearly everything that goes on inside. The CPUs you'll find in current laptops are made by AMD, Intel, Apple, and Qualcomm. The options may seem endless and their names byzantine. But choosing one is easier than you think, once you know a few CPU ground rules. Unfortunately, this doesn’t quite translate to as strong of a single-core performance, even if AMD is closer than it’s ever been to matching Intel core for core. In our single-core GeekBench and Cinebench tests, the Ryzen 9 3900X scored a 5,569 and 203, respectively. This is definitely a huge leap over the Ryzen 7 2700X, but it’s slower than the 9900K, which scored a 6,333 and 211 in the same tests. But, that’s still between a 4% and 13% difference, so the multi-core gains generally outweigh them.

We did measure some differences in temperatures and fan noise on these two Legion 7 variants. Here are some recordings in Horizon: Zero Dawn, on the Performance OC profile in both cases: Mode Neither of the chips in our AMD Ryzen 9 7950X vs Intel Core i9-13900K faceoff comes with a bundled cooler, but Raptor Lake's higher power consumption means you'll need a beefier cooler to contain the Core i9-13900K than you will for the Ryzen 9 7950X. Pricing: Intel Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 9 7950X Gaming performance has also been a traditional strength of Intel's desktop CPUs, in games at resolutions where CPU performance comes into play as the limiting factor. And for a while there, Intel hung on. Through the various "Lake" generations of processor starting with "Skylake," up against its successive AMD Ryzen challengers, Intel would sustain its lead in the one area that drives lots of sales of desktop processors among PC upgraders and builders: PC gaming.

Core i9-12900K vs. AMD Ryzen 9 5950X: Productivity Performance

Flipping through the individual games shows that the leader can change quite dramatically, with different titles responding better to either Intel or AMD. Our geometric mean of the entire test suite helps smooth that out to one digestible number, but bear in mind – the faster chip could vary based on the game you play. It took until late 2021, but chip giant Intel finally has a credible response to that marching line of Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 9 chips treading across its traditional lawn. Take its new desktop-CPU flagship: Its first real contender in quite some time is the Core i9-12900K, part of a six-CPU launch for 12th Generation Core processors (dubbed the "Alder Lake" family) that establishes the groundwork for how Intel Core chips on the desktop will look and work for years to come. As far as our ROG review units go, both allow high-power settings in sustained CPU loads, and both utilize Dynamic Boost to shift power from the CPU to the GPU in combined loads when needed. Both are also MUX-capable designs, and overall both are some of the better high-tier laptop designs available in stores, on par with counterparts such as the Alienware m series, Acer Predators, Lenovo Legions, or HP Omens. The next batch of work-related loads showcases the difference between the two in creative activities. Turbo mode

Finally, here’s how these two 2022 platforms fare in this stress test against their predecessors from 2021, the Intel Core i9-11900H and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900H. As mentioned already, the 12th gen Intel platform offers a massive increase in performance over the 11th gen i9, while the difference between the Ryzen 6000 and 5000 chips is much smaller, within 5% or so.When it comes to encoding a 12-minute 4K video to 1080p using the open-source Handbrake app, the difference between the Core i9-9900K and the Ryzen 9 3900X is no small difference, either... While a comparison of specs suggests that the Ryzen 9 3900X comes out on top in a bunch of seminal areas, real-world performance doesn't always reflect this.

In my early career, I worked as an editor of scholarly science books, and as an editor of "Dummies"-style computer guidebooks for Brady Books (now, BradyGames). I'm a lifetime New Yorker, a graduate of New York University's journalism program, and a member of Phi Beta Kappa.It's impressive that AMD has wrung so much performance out of its 12-core Ryzen 9 5900X, yet still manages to consume far less power than Intel's eight-core model. That benefit comes via TSMC's 7nm process, while Intel's 14nm process has obviously reached the end of the road in terms of absolute performance and efficiency. Intel uses a Thread Director to coordinate between these cores, ensuring processing tasks are distributed in the most sensible way. This means that i9 processors can achieve incredibly high speeds while maintaining good overall efficiency. And every other YouTube channel and media outlet will say but amd's 3D chips will be coming out. "Wait".

Overall, both the Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 9 7950X bring strong generational gains across the board, but Intel comes out ahead on the strength of its overwhelming advantage in gaming and lower overall platform costs. P-cores? E-cores? As you can see above, putting these two chips head-to-head presents an issue: We have some new kinds of cores to talk about. Platform pricing comes into play when you're making a purchasing decision, so here’s a pricing breakdown for Z790 vs X670E motherboards, along with the B650 vs B660 comparisons. However, Asus applies their Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme on the Intel model, and only the previous-generation liquid metal compound on the AMD model, which is supposed to help lower the CPU temperatures by 2-5 degrees – more or less the difference we’ve recorded in our tests. If not for this aspect, I’d expect much closer temperatures on the two, but the Intel model would still maintain a slight advantage in most games. Efficiency

AMD Ryzen 9 Processors

The reference laptop we’ll look at in this article is the Lenovo Legion 7, as one of the very few models available in both Intel and AMD variants, both paired with a full-power RTX 3080 165W Nvidia GPU. Alongside, I’ll also include the Acer Predator Helios 500 (Core i9-11980HK + RTX 3080 165W) and the Asus ROG Scar 17 (Ryzen 9 5900HX + RTX 3080 130W). TerryLaze said:How is the desktop marketplace the wrong battlefield for desktop performance/features? Overall, there's little contest to be shown here; overwhelmingly, the Intel Core i9-12900K, with its 16 available cores and 24 available threads, was able to beat out the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X's 32 threads in almost every content-creation task we threw its way. And that's without Thread Director in play. Before we get to talk about benchmarks and performance results, I wanted to touch on the fact that Intel CPU is built on a 10 nm lithography and AMD on a 7 nm technology. This can be misleading because you cannot directly compare the technologies used by Intel and TSMC (which makes the AMD processors). In general, though, Intel’s 11thn gen Core i9 processors tend to require more power than AMD’s R9s for peak performance, and are also less efficient with daily use, something to consider if you plan to use your potential laptop unplugged more than occasionally.