Dicey identified three essential elements of the British Constitution which were indicative of the rule of law: This 8th edition, published in 1915, was the last edition written by Dicey. The 9th edition (1931) and 10th edition (1959) have an introduction and appendix by E.C.S. Wade Care, Jennifer Corrin (2004-01-12). Civil Procedure and Courts in the South Pacific. Routledge Cavendish. p.3. ISBN 978-1-85941-719-5.

Foley, Michael (1989). The Silence of Constitutions: Gaps, "Abeyances," and Political Temperament in the Maintenance of Government. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-03068-4. OCLC 19126066. There are various principles and ideas invoked throughout this book and in most texts on constitutional law. These are: constitutional supremacy, separation of powers, the rule of law, democracy and transformative constitutionalism. Each of these is explained and discussed below. Before 1910, South Africa did not exist as a single state, but was a collection of independent states. After 1910, it was a Union. Then in 1961 it became a Republic that was independent of British rule.

Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution.

Neale, Charles Montague (1907). The senior wranglers of the University of Cambridge, from 1748 to 1907. With biographical, & c., notes. Bury St. Edmunds: Groom and Son. p.28 . Retrieved 4 March 2011. Follett, R. (2000). Evangelicalism, Penal Theory and the Politics of Criminal Law: Reform in England, 1808–30. Springer. p.7. Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of South Africa and Another: In re Ex Parte President of the Republic of South Africa and Others [2000] ZACC 1; 2000 (2) SA 674; 2000 (3) BCLR 241 (Pharmaceuticals) para 80. The separation of powers in South Africa is dealt with in detail in the first half of this book and briefly canvassed below. It is important to remember, however, that there is no single way of separating powers between arms of state. For example, in the Westminster model the members of the executive are drawn from members of parliament. Cabinet members are thus also members of parliament. The separation of powers is not strictly delineated, but sufficient overlap exists for parliament to hold members of cabinet accountable. In contrast, the model of the United States of America is far more rigid. Members of a single arm of state cannot also be members of another arm of state. At the same time, the US President has veto power over laws passed by the legislature and the courts can declare legislation duly passed to be substantively unconstitutional. The separation of powers doctrine as applicable to each arm of state. • The rule of law

Phoenix, Eamon & Parkinson, Alan (2010), Conflicts in the North of Ireland, 1900-2000, Four Courts Press, Dublin, Pg 33. ISBN 978 1 84682 189 9Review of Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution". American Political Science Review. 9 (2): 385–389. May 1915. doi: 10.2307/1944633. ISSN 0003-0554. As explained above, constitutions generally establish arms of state and assign powers and duties to those arms of state. A constitution may prescribe the state powers and duties in numerous ways. The distribution of powers and duties by a constitution between established arms of state is known as the separation of powers. Chapter 6 concerns special institutions established by Chapter 9 of the Constitution. These institutions, like the Public Protector, occupy an interesting zone in the separation of powers. Chapter 9 institutions are not part of any arm of state and perform specialised functions. Simultaneously, they are held to account by the executive, legislature, and judiciary. Dicey, Albert Venn (1887). "Speech of Professor Dicey, at the Liberal Unionists' meeting, in the Music Hall, Birkenhead, December 10, 1887". "Daily Post" and "Echo" Offices. JSTOR 60243925. Chapter 10 introduces the Bill of Rights. The chapter begins with an introduction to the Bill of Rights and some general principles pertaining to the Bill of Rights. The six chapters after that deal with specific rights or groups of rights in the Bill of Rights. • QUESTIONS

Sugarman, David (1983). "Review: The Legal Boundaries of Liberty: Dicey, Liberalism and Legal Science". The Modern Law Review. 46 (1): 102–111.Albutt v Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation and Others [2010] ZACC 4; 2010 (3) SA 293 (CC); 2010 (2) SACR 101 (CC); 2010 (5) BCLR 391 (CC) (Albutt) para 50. Garner, Bryan A. (2001). A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage (2nd, reviseded.). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 177. ISBN 978-0-19-507769-8. In modern usage, common law is contrasted with a number of other terms. First, in denoting the body of judge-made law based on that developed in England... [P]erhaps most commonly within Anglo-American jurisdictions, common law is contrasted with statutory law ... A. V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (Macmillan, 10th ed, 1959) p.202 Dicey, A. V. (1885). Lectures Introductory to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (1ed.). London: Macmillan . Retrieved 5 April 2018– via Internet Archive. ; Dicey, A. V. (1915). Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (8ed.). London: Macmillan . Retrieved 5 April 2018– via Internet Archive. The 8th edition, 1915, is the last by Dicey himself. The final revised edition was the 10th, 1959, edited by E. C. S. Wade: Ogg, Frederic A. (June 1940). "Review of Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution and Constitutional Law". American Political Science Review. 34 (3): 579–582. doi: 10.2307/1949373. ISSN 0003-0554.

Dicey's rule of law formula consists of three classic tenets. The first is that the regular law is supreme over arbitrary and discretionary powers. "[N]o man is punishable ... except for a distinct breach of the law established in the ordinary legal manner before the ordinary courts of the land." [14]The doctrine of the rule of law dictates that government must be conducted according to law. This was first established by British legal theorist A. V. Dicey. Democracy entails that citizens of a state decide on issues concerning themselves and their state. But how this plays out in practice can depend on a model of democracy. Should all citizens vote on every issue? Should representatives be elected to vote on behalf of citizens? If so, how should those representatives be elected and how should they be held to account to citizens? Models of democracy can differ on the answers to these questions.