The book is part memoir, part true-crime story, part legal procedural. All of the parts gel and flow seamlessly, Alix has taken this complicated story and presented it in a straightforward way without artifice. It reads so much better because of this. Of course we never really find out what it was like to grow up with an alleged murderer. Sharkey's brother didn't run around the house wielding knives; the boys and their sister had a less than idyllic upbringing, but it wasn't brutally hopeless either, thanks to their mum, and until puberty hit the brother seems to have been more or less okay. There's no explanation for why he turned out the way he did (while Sharkey didn't), other than the hinted-at possibility of sexual abuse at the hands of a teacher, and no warning signs of the cutting-heads-off-bunnies variety, other than the brother's callous/cruel treatment of and early predilection for young girls; which obviously wasn't enough to set off alarm bells, at least during the 1970s and 80s. So if "My Life with a Murderer!" is what you're after, this book (thankfully) won't deliver. It's more of a memoir of growing up under very particular circumstances during a time that seems very far away now. In 2001, 15 year old Danielle Jones vanished on her way to school. In 2002, Stuart Campbell, Danielle's uncle, was convicted of her murder. Her body has never been found. My brother, the killer is an interesting, first hand account into the life of child-killer Stuart Campbell. It’s written by Alix Sharpley, his elder brother, and describes in great detail events such as their childhood and the murder charge itself.

A little disappointed that my library categorized this as true crime. This is a family memoir and is focused on the author’s experience, thoughts and feelings in particular. While there was a crime, there is never a resolution. The author could have at least detailed what the prosecutors THOUGHT (or alleged in court) happened to the 15-year-old girl. But he didn’t. And the convicted murderer won’t talk. So you are left with a very unsatisfying vagueness about what really happened. I'm not sure I can say I enjoyed reading this book - purely because of the nature of what this book is about. However it was super interesting, and the idea of nature vs nurture was a strong theme within this book - particularly with the final couple of chapters. (i won't say more in case it's a spoiler) I raced through this haunting but important book. I have to disclose that I know the author so that obviously added another layer of intrigue. But from anyone's perspective, it begs the question, how can someone I grew up with and thought I knew so well behave so monstrously? And why won't he 'fess up to the whereabouts of her body? Of course, this isn't ever a book you could say you enjoyed, purely for the nature of the crime, but it was a captivating read which was well written. I was particularly interested in the forthcoming parole hearing due at the end of this year, especially with 'Helen's Law's now in force, meaning cases where the location of a body is never disclosed a parole review is likely to be denied - no body, no parole. The author has done really well to not make the book all about himself or his brother, voicing his concerns on many occasions throughout the book of the anguish and upset Danielle's family are still going through. What this book probably doesn’t need is another review. But there are a few things I will say: Content warning as well as a profusion of foul language. That said, the author is an engaging writer (as a journalist by trade).There was a moment of foreshadowing in the text that never seems to have been pursued. When the brother went to another school, the writer was jealous and destroyed his brother's electronic calculator (a new device at the time). Even though the writer was beaten by his mother, he never confessed and refused to admit his guilt because then he would have had to apologize. When I read this I thought, well, that is the same pattern as the killer years later — he will never admit his crime, will never apologize. The writer did not seem to have made this connection, how his own behaviour as a boy so strongly evokes his brother's actions years later. I will never understand why murderers who have been convicted, and are already in prison for life, don't reveal where the victims bodies are. It's heatless and incredibly frustrating - this is something I still don;t understand from reading this book. I wish it could have looked at this further. A macabre beach read with a strong intro where Stuart (frustratingly) plays his mind games upon confrontation with the author. Might as well have published all the prison letters as a book instead of the last two.

I read it as I wanted to understand how you would feel if you found out someone you knew - were related to - had committed a horrific crime. It certainly delivered in this regard; the book shows the authors evolving emotions from confusion, to disbelief, to anger, and then to understanding (the cause - his brother's own history of being abused) - whilst never reaching forgiveness and retaining contempt at the pain he put his victims family through.True crime usually tells the story from the point of view of the victim or the perpetrator - this book comes from a different angle. Alix Sharkey, is Stuart Campbells brother. In this book, which covers a dual time line, the events of Danielle's disappearance and subsequent investigation and Stuart's childhood in an attempt to find out what makes a killer.