CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the implementation of the PACE Framework has a positively impacted on the development of person-centred practice, and on the experience of care for patients, their significant others and nursing staff. Exploring the data and reviewing the evidence base it is apparent that PACE provides an effective framework to record care in a way that directly impacts on registered nurses’ ability to engage in person-centred practices. This assists registered nurses to move away from delivering task orientation care towards person-centred care that focuses on working in a holistic way; developing an understanding of what patients value and appreciate most about their care. It is unnecessary to seek consent under paragraphs 5.1 and 5.2 if this would cause disproportionate inconvenience to the person concerned. (See Note 5C.) Notes for guidance

a) in relation to the power to search without a search warrant in paragraph 5 (for purposes of serving TPIM notice), finding the individual on whom the notice is to be served.When it is practicable to tell a person why their arrest is necessary (as required by paragraphs 2.2, 3.3 and Note 3), the constable should outline the facts, information and other circumstances which provide the grounds for believing that their arrest is necessary and which the officer considers satisfy one or more of the statutory criteria in sub-paragraphs (a) to (f), namely: Consider further research projects to explore the value of PACE as a method of greater patient and carer involvement in decision making regarding planned care and evaluations of nursing effectiveness 2. Consider a longitudinal study to evaluate the sustainability of PACE. iv) subject to paragraph 2.9, the names of the officers who executed it and any authorised persons who accompanied them, and i) justice of the peace or a Circuit judge consists of or includes items subject to legal privilege;

The officer in charge of the search shall first try to communicate with the occupier, or any other person entitled to grant access to the premises, explain the authority under which entry is sought and ask the occupier to allow entry, unless: vi) any grounds for refusing the occupier’s request to have someone present during the search, see paragraph 6.11; calls to a fire or burglary made by or on behalf of an occupier or searches following the activation of fire or burglar alarms or discovery of insecure premises; that the date and time of the interview will take account of their circumstances and the needs of the investigation; and CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE DETENTION, TREATMENT AND QUESTIONING OF PERSONS BY POLICE OFFICERS Commencement - Transitional Arrangementswhom the officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting is about to commit an offence or to be committing an offence;

d) subject to paragraph 2.6, under any other power given to police to enter premises with or without a search warrant for any purpose connected with the investigation into an alleged or suspected offence. (See Note 2B.) Extending the power of arrest to all offences provides a constable with the ability to use that power to deal with any situation. However applying the necessity criteria requires the constable to examine and justify the reason or reasons why a person needs to be arrested or (as the case may be) further arrested, for an offence for the custody officer to decide whether to authorise their detention for that offence. See Note 2Ce) That there are no reasonable grounds to believe the material to be sought, when making application to a: Terrorism Act 2000, Schedule 5, paragraph 11. 2B Examples of the other powers in paragraph 2.3(d) include: When a person has been arrested for an indictable offence, a police officer has power under PACE, section 32 to search the premises where the person was arrested or where the person was immediately before being arrested. (c) Search of premises occupied or controlled by the arrested person This Code does not apply to the exercise of a statutory power to enter premises or to inspect goods, equipment or procedures if the exercise of that power is not dependent on the existence of grounds for suspecting that an offence may have been committed and the person exercising the power has no reasonable grounds for such suspicion.

A Powers to search and seize must be used fairly, responsibly, with respect for people who occupy premises being searched or are in charge of property being seized and without unlawful discrimination. Under the Equality Act 2010, section 149, when police officers are carrying out their functions, they also have a duty to have due regard to the need to eliminate unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation, to advance equality of opportunity between people who share a relevant protected characteristic and people who do not share it, and to take steps to foster good relations between those persons. See Note 1A. An officer shall be appointed as the officer in charge of the search (see paragraph 2.10), in respect of any search made under a warrant issued under PACE Act 1984, Schedule 1 or the Terrorism Act 2000, Schedule 5. They are responsible for making sure the search is conducted with discretion and in a manner that causes the least possible disruption to any business or other activities carried out on the premises. PACE sets out to strike the right balance between the powers of the police and the rights and freedoms of the public. Maintaining that balance is a central element of PACE. This might apply where the suspect is a known persistent offender with a history of serial offending against property (theft and criminal damage) and it is thought likely that they may continue offending if they are not arrested.xi) when the occupier was not present, the place where copies of the Notice of Powers and Rights and search warrant were left on the premises, see paragraph 6.8. The ‘officer in charge of the search’ means the officer assigned specific duties and responsibilities under this Code. Whenever there is a search of premises to which this Code applies one officer must act as the officer in charge of the search. (See Note 2F.) C As set out in section 58, material must be returned to the person from whom it was seized, except when it is clear some other person has a better right to it. (See Note 7E.) When this Code requires the prior authority or agreement of an officer of at least inspector or superintendent rank, that authority may be given by a sergeant or chief inspector authorised to perform the functions of the higher rank under PACE, section 107.