But to clearly understand which SSD will offer you the most value, we will need to dig deeper. Hence, let’s take a closer look at who will win the fight between Samsung 870 EVO vs Crucial MX500. Overview of Samsung 870 EVO SSD JP” is attached at the end of the parts number of official Japanese distributed products shipped after April 2017. With the 6th generation VNAND technology and SATA interface limit of 560MB/s sequential reading and 530 MB/s writing speeds, the Samsung 870 EVO offers incredible performance. Whether you are gaming or working, these SSDs accelerated write speeds and larger variable buffers will ensure high performance for a long time. In addition, your data will be kept secure thanks to the full disk encryption within the hardware. Endurance Simply put, both the Samsung 870 EVO and Crucial MX500 have a speed limit of 600MB/s as both use the SATA protocol. However, Samsung 870 EVO SSDs offer 530MB/s sequential writing speed, which is 20MB/s more than the Crucial MX500 SSDs. Also, Samsung 870 EVO is more expensive than the Crucial MX500, which is also a factor to consider. SSDs have become one of the most popular devices among the storage markets and SSDs’ options are increasing. They are a lot of famous SSD manufacturers around the world, such as Samsung, Seagate, Crucial, Toshiba, etc.

The Crucial MX500 SSDs have a SATA III interface, offering a maximum speed of 600 MB/s. In sequential reading, the speed measure reaches 560 MB/s, just like the 870 EVO. However, its sequential writing speed is less than its Samsung counterpart at only 510 MB/s. However, this performance difference is difficult to notice in everyday operations. In the table below, we have summarized all the similarities and differences between Samsung 870 EVO and Crucial MX500 SSDs. Specification There are many popular SSDs on the market including Crucial BX500 and Crucial MX500.But, as for Crucial BX500 and Crucial MX500, what are their differences and which one is better? Hence, we will explorer and compare the features and specifications available on Crucial BX500 and Crucial MX500. Overview of Crucial BX500 and MX500If you do not mind the lower random reading and sequential writing speed or slight endurance shortage, the Crucial 500MX can be a fantastic option to consider. It offers excellent value and performance for the money. On the other hand, if you want excellent service in terms of specifications, features, reliability, and performance, the Samsung 870 EVO will be the best option to go for.” The MX500 was launched by Micron as the first Crucial drive to be based on Micron's 6 4-layer 3D TLC NAND solution. This drive uses the TLC NAND instead of MLC NAND and offers a sizeable boost in performance (estimated to be around 10%) compared to the older model MX300. In that aspect, it lives up to Crucial's claims. It also comes bundled with Acronis' True Image HD app that allows you to clone your existing hard drive to make the OS installation process easier for a boot drive upgrade. With around 500 MB per second of read and write speeds, the MX500 should satisfy the average users. MX500 2.5: Price UK To sum up, as for Crucial MX500 vs BX500, this post has shown their differences in 5 aspects. In my opinion, the Crucial MX500 SSD is better than Crucial BX500 SSD since it has better performance and provides a longer warranty.

The Crucial MX500 is the first Crucial’s drive based on Micron’s 64-layer 3D TLC NAND and it is the second generation of Crucial’s mainstream MX series using TLC NAND. The Crucial MX500 SSD is available in both 2.5 inch and M.2 2280 form factors. It comes with four different storage capacities and can reach up to 2TB. To clone OS from HDD to SSD, you can use a clone tool. Thus, the professional SSD clone software – MiniTool ShadowMaker is recommended, which enables you to upgrade hard drives without data loss. Crucial MX500 is three years older than the Samsung 870 EVO. This series was released on January 2018. These SSDs are also highly regarded among the PC user community because of the quality and performance level they offer at a very reasonable price. Design

Niche No More

Active average power use comparison based on published specs of the 1TB Crucial MX500 SSD and the 1TB Western Digital® Caviar Blue™ WD10EZEX internal hard drive. All other capacities of the Crucial MX500 SSD have comparable active average power consumption specs. Crucial BX500 comes with five different capacities, yet Crucial MX500 comes with four different capacities. Both of them can reach up to 2TB. Look at the following chart: Once all steps are finished, you have successfully cloned the system to the Crucial MX500 SSD or Crucial BX500 SSD. Bottom Line