Bahr D.C. (2001). Oral Motor Assessment and treatment: Ages and stages. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. [ Google Scholar]

National Department of Health (2015). National consolidated guidelines for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and the management of HIV in children, adolescents and adults. Retrieved July 26, 2016, from: http://www.doh.co.za Brazelton T.B. (1973). Neonatal behavioural assessment scale. Clinics in Developmental Medicine No. 50. Philadelphia, PA: J.P. Lippincott. [ Google Scholar]Arvedson, 2008; Arvedson & Brodsky, 2002; Da Costa & Van der Schans, 2008; Darrow & Harley, 1998; Gewolb & Vice, 2006; Hall, 2011; Jadcherla, 2016; Qureshi, Vice, Taciak, Bosma & Gewolb, 2002; Rudolph & Link, 2002; Swigert, 2010 Reilly S., Skuse D., & Wolke D (2000). SOMA: Schedule for oral motor assessment. Eastgardens, New South Wales: Whurr Publishers, Ltd. [ Google Scholar] Van Haastert I.C., De Vries L.S., Helders P.J.M., & Jongmans M.J (2006). Early gross motor development of preterm infants according to the Alberta Neonatal Motor Scale. Journal of Pediatrics, 149( 5), 617–622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.07.025 [ PubMed] [ Google Scholar]

Jadcherla S. (2016). Dysphagia in the high-risk infant: Potential factors and mechanisms. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 103( 2), 622S–6288S. http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.110106 [ PMC free article] [ PubMed] [ Google Scholar] Arvedson & Brodsky, 2002; Clark, 2009; Hall, 2001; Van Haastert, De Vries, Helders & Jongmans, 2006 Pados B.F., Park J., Estrem H., & Awotwi A (2016). Assessment tools for evaluation of oral feeding in infants younger than 6 months. Advances in Neonatal Care, 16, 143–150. [ PMC free article] [ PubMed] [ Google Scholar] Three themes were identified linked to the content sections of the first questionnaire. The first content theme was the Need for a valid assessment tool. The second theme was Content of the NFAS and the last was Scoring criteria. Only the first theme’s results are discussed with this objective. Questions 4 and 5 in the first questionnaire investigated the rationale for the development of the NFAS. All participants ( n = 5; 100%) agreed that the development of a valid clinical assessment tool was a relevant area of study and confirmed the need for such a tool. Some participants also provided further comments to reflect their agreement.

Palmer M.M., Crawley K., & Blanco I (1993). Neonatal Oral-Motor Assessment Scale: A reliability study. Journal of Perinatology, 13, 28–35. [ PubMed] [ Google Scholar] Arvedson J.C., & Brodsky L (2002). Pediatric swallowing and feeding: Assessment and management. Clifton Park: Thomson Delmar Learning. [ Google Scholar]

Crist W., Dobbelsteyn C., Brousseau A.M., & Napier-Phillips A (2004). Pediatric assessment scale for severe feeding problems: Validity and reliability of a new scale for tube-fed children. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 19, 403–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0115426504019004403 [ PubMed] [ Google Scholar] Clark D.A. (2009). Evaluation and care of the neonate. In Ensher G.L., Clark D.A., & Songer N.S. (Eds.), Families, infants and young children at risk: Pathways to best practice (pp. 29–38). Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing Co. [ Google Scholar] Dawson B., & Trapp R.G (2004). Basic and clinical biostatistics. (4th edn). New York: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill. [ Google Scholar]Wolff P.H. (1959). Observations on human infants. Psychosomatic Medicine, 221, 110–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006842-195903000-00004 [ PubMed] [ Google Scholar] Faculty of Humanities (2004). Undergraduate syllabi and regulations. University of Pretoria, Pretoria. [ Google Scholar] Three participants suggested clearer administration guidelines and using a different approach to score the data. Results of round one led to the refinement of the initial scoring system. Binary choices were included for each item in all sections, with clear administration and scoring guidelines in the revised instrument. The scoring method was refined with assistance from a biostatistician to include a binary (yes/no) outcome for each section and a total score that will enable comparison with a widely accepted gold standard for swallowing assessment, in this case the MBSS.

Question 3: Comment further on the sections and items in the NFAS if all your opinions/suggestions could not be expressed in the previous questions. Da Costa S.P., & Van Der Schans C (2008). The reliability of the Neonatal Oral-Motor Assessment Scale. Acta Paediatrica, 97, 21–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00577.x [ PubMed] [ Google Scholar] there is definitely a need for a well-researched assessment tool for use with infants…’ [Participant 4, Female, SLT] Lau C., & Smith E.O (2011). A novel approach to assess oral feeding skills of preterm infants. Neonatology, 100, 64–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000321987 [ PMC free article] [ PubMed] [ Google Scholar] In summary, all participants agreed on the need for more research to develop a validated assessment instrument. Three of the five participants agreed on the comprehensive nature of the proposed content for the draft NFAS. Lastly, all the participants recommended refinement of the scoring system.Schulz V., Kozell K., Biondo P.D., Stiles C., Martins L., Tonkin K., et al. (2009). The malignant wound assessment tool: A validation study using a Delphi approach. Palliative Medicine, 23( 3), 266–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216309102536 [ PubMed] [ Google Scholar] Question 5: Is there a need for the development of a validated clinical assessment instrument to use in clinical practice with neonatal dysphagia in the international arena? Karl D.J. (2004). Using principles of newborn behavioural state organization to facilitate breastfeeding. American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 29( 5), 292–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005721-200409000-00006 [ PubMed] [ Google Scholar] Robin Glass receives an honorarium from Education Resources, Inc. and receives royalties from her book. Tsai S.W., Chen C.H., & Lin M.C (2010). Prediction for developmental delay on Neonatal Oral Motor Assessment Scale in preterm infants without brain lesion. Pediatrics International, 52, 65–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-200X.2009.02882.x [ PubMed] [ Google Scholar]