Groes-Green, Christian (June 2012). "Philogynous masculinities: contextualizing alternative manhood in Mozambique". Men and Masculinities. 15 (2): 91–111. doi: 10.1177/1097184X11427021. S2CID 145337308. Willis, Paul (1977). Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Farnborough, England: Saxon House. OCLC 692250005. Connell, R. W.; Messerschmidt, James W. (December 2005). "Hegemonic Masculinity". Gender & Society. 19 (6): 829–859. doi: 10.1177/0891243205278639. ISSN 0891-2432. S2CID 5804166. Connell's sociology emphasises the historical nature of social reality and the transformative character of social practice. Her writing tries to combine empirical detail, structural analysis, critique, and relevance to practice. Much of her empirical work uses biographical (life-history) interviewing in education, family life and workplaces. She has written or co-written twenty-one books and more than 150 research papers, [16] and her work has been translated into 18 languages. [17] [18] Class and education [ edit ] Raewyn Connell Prize, a biennial award established in her honour by The Australian Sociological Association (2010) [35]

Research shows that violence plays an integral and complex role in male identity, and that it is an accepted and normal part of many boys’ lives and experiences. Young men tend to refer to violence primarily in relation to men’s violence towards other men. Violence has been seen as a way to assert one’s masculinity in front of other men, or a way of dealing with things that might challenge aspects of masculinity and cause a feeling of shame. 71Fainaru, Steve; Fainaru-Wada, Mark (2014). League of denial: the NFL, concussions, and the battle for truth. New York: Three Rivers Press. ISBN 9780770437565. Hooper, Charlotte (2001). Manly states: masculinities, international relations, and gender politics. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 9780231120753.

Complicity to the aforementioned masculine characteristics was another key feature of the original framework of hegemonic masculinity. Yet still since men benefit from the patriarchal dividend, they generally gain from the overall subordination of women. However, complicity is not so easily defined as pure subordination since marriage, fatherhood, and community life often involve extensive compromises with women rather than simple domination over them. In this way hegemony is not gained through necessarily violent or forceful means, but it is achieved through culture, institutions, and persuasions. [3] Martino, Wayne (July 1995). "Boys and literacy: Exploring the construction of hegemonic masculinities and the formation of literate capacities for boys in the English classroom". English in Australia. 112: 11–24. Hearn, Jeff (April 2004). "From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men". Feminist Theory. 5 (1): 49–72. doi: 10.1177/1464700104040813. S2CID 143891341. a b c d e Scott, John, ed. (2015) [1994]. "Hegemonic masculinity". A Dictionary of Sociology (4thed.). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. p.302. doi: 10.1093/acref/9780199683581.001.0001. ISBN 9780191763052. LCCN 2014942679. a b Weir, Kirsten (February 2017). "The men America left behind". Monitor on Psychology. 48 (2): 34.Efthymiou, Stratis Andreas. (25 June 2019). Nationalism, Militarism and Masculinity in Post-Conflict Cyprus. ISBN 978-3-030-14702-0. OCLC 1106167576. a b c McGuffey, C. Shawn; Rich, B. Lindsay (2011). "Playing in the gender transgression zone: Race, class, and hegemonic masculinity in middle childhood". In Spade, Joan Z.; Valentine, Catherine G. (eds.). The kaleidoscope of gender: prisms, patterns, and possibilities (3rded.). Los Angeles, California: Sage Publications. pp. 166–176. ISBN 9781412979061.