Júpiter es el planeta más grande del sistema solar y el quinto en orden de lejanía al Sol. Es un gigante gaseoso que forma parte de los denominados planetas exteriores. Recibe su nombre del dios romano Júpiter (Zeus en la mitología griega). Es uno de los objetos naturales más brillantes en un cielo nocturno despejado, superado solo por la Luna, Venus y algunas veces Marte.​

The Celestron Astromaster 130EQ, with its user-friendly design and reasonably priced features, makes it a suitable choice for beginners looking to explore the night sky. This reflector telescope boasts an aperture of 130mm, which is ideal for observing bright objects in the sky such as planets, moons, and nebulae.

This is particularly useful when observing planets or other objects at high magnification where any vibration or movement can cause significant image distortion. could do with a recommendation on a Barlow suitable for a 5.1" f/5. Not sure whether to get a 2x or 3x..... Celestron Astromaster 130EQ Vs Skywatcher Explorer 130 - Getting Started General Help and Advice - Stargazers Lounge Jump to content The eyepieces are average and are to be expected at this price point. The 20mm eyepiece did seem to create internal reflections, marring the narrow true field of view of just 0.9 degrees (the Full Moon’s angular diameter is just 0.5 degrees, for comparison). The 10mm eyepiece is perhaps the best of the two, but the eye relief on both is quite poor - you have to push your eyes right up into the eyepiece cup to see anything, making for uncomfortable viewing, and almost impossible viewing for spectacle wearers. Straight from the horses mouth: http://www.celestron.com/astronomy/celestron-astromaster-130eq.html

The eq mount is heavy and not practical to use for a beginner. Thankfully I had the ressources to build a custom Dobsonian mount out of plywood, which greatly improved the observation experience. I totally agree with the comments at the beginning of the article. I encountered all the issues mentionned. I think this is better than the one other day, stars seem sharper, and more struture in the Nebula.

Currently popular on idealo

Celestron Astromaster 130 EQ used to come with a parabolic mirror in the early days. But now, it is shipped with spherical primary mirrors only. What would be a decent telescope in the same price range, or possibly a little more (to be decent, I guess)? Reply It seems to me, that a dobsonian may well be a better "family" scope, with the logic of adjusting an Alt Az mount being easier to understand than an EQ mount. When an optician figures a blank, they figure it into a sphere first, then they parabolise it. For spherical mirrors to be installed and sold, they stop at a sphere, and do not parabolise it. The curvature of a parabola is exotic compared to that of a sphere, and therefore more difficult to figure, and more costly as a result. You can remove your mirror and send it off to be parabolised. Who knows, it may already be a parabola, therefore you'd ask to have it tested beforehand. Or, you can replace it with a ready-made parabolic-mirror, then pop it into place once it arrives. Nothing will be changed, except the figure of the primary. You then collimate it, and off you go. When consulted, Celestron gives varying answers as to whether the AstroMaster 130 scopes are sold with spherical mirrors or not. One should not have to play the lottery to get a decent instrument with hundreds of dollars on the line, and Celestron should be able to give a concrete answer as to the nature of their product. This alone disqualifies the AstroMaster 130 from being a serious recommendation in our book.