MtCmdChannelSwitch: ctrl_chl=8, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=8 DBDCIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=0, TXStream=2, RXStream=2, scan(1) MtCmdSetTxRxPath: ctrl_chl=64, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=64, RxPath=3, BandIdx=1, ChBand=1, BW=0,TXStream=2, RXStream=3, scan(1) gigabites csatlakozó –Egy Gigabit WAN és három Gigabit LAN csatlakozó, tízszer gyorsabb, mint a 100–Base T Ethernet. Also, the network needs to be very crowded and yes, you still need compatible client devices which can make use of it. Then again, the 2×2 config offered by the Asus RT-AX53U is nothing to brag about. Lastly, I need to mention the support for AiMesh which allows you to connect the RT-AX53U to a larger network of routers and form a mesh system. It’s pretty much the same concept as with the dedicated mesh systems, but you do get the possibility to use different types of Asus routers and even across different WiFi generations. The Wireless Test (5GHz) MtCmdChannelSwitch: ctrl_chl=9, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=9 DBDCIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=0, TXStream=2, RXStream=2, scan(1)

MtCmdChannelSwitch: ctrl_chl=10, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=10 DBDCIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=0, TXStream=2, RXStream=2, scan(1) After detaching the heat sinks, I could identify a dual-core 880MHz Mediatek MT7621AT SoC which is not really the best performer on the market, but I assume it would do fine with a less dense network. Then, I could see 128MB of flash storage from Spansion (S34ML01G200TFI00) and 256MB of DDR3L RAM from ESMT (M15T2G16128A).WtcSetMaxStaNum: MaxStaNum:226, BssidNum:12, WdsNum:16, MSTANum:1, MaxNumChipRept:32, MinMcastWcid:275 So, just use the RT-AX53U with a smaller network since it’s clear that this is what it was built for. The next client device is equipped with an Intel 8265 adapter (WiFi 5) and the wireless performance differs a bit more near the router (557Mbps at 5 feet and 526Mbps at 15 feet), but it does get more similar to the WiFi 6 client device the farther I went. At about 75 feet, the attenuation was about -86dB and the throughput was 22.6Mbps upstream and 17.8Mbps downstream, so I would not go farther than that. Asus RT-AX53U – Wireless Test – 5GHz – WiFi 5 and WiFi 6 client devices – Downstream Asus RT-AX53U – Signal Strength (Attenuation) – 5GHz – WiFi 5 and WiFi 6 client devices – Downstream

MtCmdChannelSwitch: ctrl_chl=56, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=56 DBDCIdx=1, ChBand=1, BW=0, TXStream=2, RXStream=2, scan(1) The Pixel 2 XL was a bit more interesting because near the router, at 5 feet, I measured an average of 654Mbps upstream, with a drop to 252Mbps downstream, so it’s very close to the AX200 client device. And you will get a decent performance as long as you don’t get farther than 45 feet because the signal dropped a lot (-87dB) before reaching 65 feet, so there’s no use going that far since the connection simply drops. Asus RT-AX53U vs other AX1800-class routers (5GHz).

MtCmdChannelSwitch: ctrl_chl=52, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=52 DBDCIdx=1, ChBand=1, BW=0, TXStream=2, RXStream=2, scan(1) MtCmdSetTxRxPath: ctrl_chl=100, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=100, RxPath=3, BandIdx=1, ChBand=1, BW=0,TXStream=2, RXStream=3, scan(1)

MtCmdChannelSwitch: ctrl_chl=1, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=1 DBDCIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=0, TXStream=2, RXStream=2, scan(1) pci 0000:02:00.0: 2.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by 2.5 GT/s PCIe x1 link at 0000:00:01.0 (capable of 4.000 Gb/s with 5.0 GT/s PCIe x1 link)

The Asus RT-AX58U is a fast and affordable Wi-Fi 6 router

MtCmdChannelSwitch: ctrl_chl=64, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=64 DBDCIdx=1, ChBand=1, BW=0, TXStream=2, RXStream=2, scan(1) MtCmdChannelSwitch: ctrl_chl=112, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=112 DBDCIdx=1, ChBand=1, BW=0, TXStream=2, RXStream=2, scan(1) Ultragyors WiFi –az RT-AX53U az 1024-QAM támogatásával hatalmasat gyorsít a vezeték nélküli kapcsolatokon. Az összesített hálózati sebesség kb. 1800 Mbps lesz — 574 Mbps a 2,4 GHz-es sávon és 1201 Mbps on az 5 GHz-esen. I do need to mention that the Asus RT-AX53U does support OFDMA (with no mention on whether it’s only on the 5GHz radio band), MU-MIMO (2×2, of course) and up to 80MHz channel bandwidth, which is fine for most house-based networks.

MtCmdSetTxRxPath: ctrl_chl=104, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=106, RxPath=3, BandIdx=1, ChBand=1, BW=2,TXStream=2, RXStream=3, scan(0) MtCmdSetTxRxPath: ctrl_chl=11, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=11, RxPath=3, BandIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=0,TXStream=2, RXStream=3, scan(1) Memory: 246200K/262144K available (7949K kernel code, 2954K rwdata, 1936K rodata, 268K init, 327K bss, 15944K reserved, 0K cma-reserved) MtCmdSetTxRxPath: ctrl_chl=3, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=3, RxPath=3, BandIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=0,TXStream=2, RXStream=3, scan(1)MtCmdSetTxRxPath: ctrl_chl=40, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=40, RxPath=3, BandIdx=1, ChBand=1, BW=0,TXStream=2, RXStream=3, scan(1) The first client device is the AX200 PC and, at 5 feet (-35dB attenuation), I saw an average of 657Mbps upstream and 348Mbps downstream. At 15 feet, despite a signal drop (-49dB), the throughput wasn’t that affected since I still measured an average of 601Mbps up and 314Mbps downstream. Going to 45 feet, it could still offer decent values: 243Mbps upstream and 121Mbps downstream. But at about 75 feet, the attenuation was -86dB and the throughput was not that great: 24.5Mbps upstream and 18.1Mbps downstream. Asus RT-AX53U vs RT-AX55 vs RT-AX56U MtCmdChannelSwitch: ctrl_chl=40, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=40 DBDCIdx=1, ChBand=1, BW=0, TXStream=2, RXStream=2, scan(1)