eventually this will overcome with future phones that support 40W charging - but wait - still that is not possible with the 130W charger.

130W AC Adapter | NOMAD® 130W AC Adapter | NOMAD®

But what exactly do you mean when you claim that I “have been wrong on this”? I said earlier in this thread that using the Dell charger with a smartphone would be fine, in that it would not damage the phone or charger, since you specifically wanted to know if you could use the Dell charger with your smartphone without "destroying" it. I did NOT say that the Dell charger would charge your smartphone at maximum speed, in fact I specifically DID say in my earlier post above that not all USB PD chargers support all voltage levels. So maybe be a bit more careful before you go around telling people they’re wrong -- especially considering that in the same post where you claimed I was wrong, you yourself were wrong about how amperage delivery works, since you suggested that future USB PD chargers provide a wide range of amperage levels, which isn't how the spec works. Next time, instead of incorrectly calling people out for being wrong, perhaps just thank them for taking the time to try to help you, even though you're just some random person on the Internet to them and it's not like they're being paid to take that time out of their lives to help you. RAVPower appears to have a different design philosophy than Aukey when it comes to exceeding its rated wattage. Where the Aukey chargers we tested could sustain wattages above their advertised maximums, RAVPower units could hit higher peaks, but then would shut themselves down after a few minutes. For example, the Pioneer RP-PC133 outputted an epic 73.7 watts (19.5V, 3.78A) on the USB-C port alone, but it didn’t last long. As an electrical engineer this article really makes me cringe. Not because there is a lot wrong with the tests done, and also not the low technical depth. No, the contents are fine but the constant use of the horrible words wattage and amperage are offending and make my brain hurt. Now unfortunately these words have been misused so much that they have become part of the normal vocabulary, that's how languages work. However anyone who knows the proper words would never use those. So I hope you will use the proper words next time, they are power (or rated power) instead of wattage and current instead of amperage.

First of all, for the size of this thing, the fact that it can do 100W charging at all is impressive. I do wish the port itself had a different color interior to differentiate it from the standard USB C port, instead of the small marking on the charger face. And on top of all that, USB PD chargers don’t specify individual amperage levels. They specify individual VOLTAGE levels, and then a MAXIMUM amperage level. The device being charged then selects a voltage level and then draws whatever amperage it needs at any given time, which changes based on load. You can see this if you connect a USB-C multimeter between your charger and device sometime.

USB-C chargers 2023 | Android Central Best 100W USB-C chargers 2023 | Android Central

AeroWB said:As an electrical engineer this article really makes me cringe. Not because there is a lot wrong with the tests done, and also not the low technical depth. No, the contents are fine but the constant use of the horrible words wattage and amperage are offending and make my brain hurt. Now unfortunately these words have been misused so much that they have become part of the normal vocabulary, that's how languages work. However anyone who knows the proper words would never use those. So I hope you will use the proper words next time, they are power (or rated power) instead of wattage and current instead of amperage. Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test. This latter feature is important to me. When we travel as a family, it's inevitable that someone will need to charge their iPad, while another will need to charge their phone, and so on. At this point you have to buy a number of chargers, or you have to hope that a single charger can power all of your devices. At 130W, the UGREEN charger can handle multiple devices quite well. To test it out, we took it along for our Thanksgiving drive to visit relatives. The bottom line is that it didn't break a proverbial sweat when two phones and an iPad were plugged in at the same time. It also performed quite well powering individual devices. There's no drop-off with other brands I've tried in terms of the time taken until fully charged. For the curious, here is a fantastically well-written and rigorously illustrated article on this subject, describing the minutiae of a PD implementation bug (in Apple’s own hardware, no less!) that I would recommend to all interested parties. Das 130W Autoladegerät von UGREEN kommt in einem schön gearbeiteten Karton in welchem es in zusammen mit dem USB-C auf USB-C Ladekabel liegt. Des weiteren sind noch eine mehrsprachige Anleitung und auch ein Faltblatt mit Sicherheitsinformationen dabei.We found that some chargers, specifically all three RAVPower chargers we tested, could not sustain their highest possible wattages and, after less than 20 minutes, would shut down. We conducted a second series of heat tests with each charger at one watt below its maximum rated wattage (ex: 59 watts on a 60-watt charger) and recorded the temperature there as well. Benutzerfreundlichkeit (Einhaltung der Beschreibung, Funktionsweise, Erklärung zum Produkt,...): ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ The only difference with wattage and amperage is that so many people have been misusing these words persistently that they have become accepted. In our tests (using a load tester), the RAVPower Pioneer RP-PC133, delivered a full 15 watts (3.27V, 4.72A) from its Type-A port while also providing up to 54.9 watts (19.6V, 2.8A) from its USB-C port at the same time. More importantly, when we hooked the RP-PC133 up to both a laptop and a phone at the same time, it gave the laptop a full 51 watts of juice, which is better than Aukey's slightly-smaller Omnia Mix PA-B3, which gave the same laptop only 38 watts with the phone attached.

Dell USB-C 130 W AC Adapter with 1meter Power Cord - United

If you’re using a 16-inch MacBook Pro or another USB-C laptop that requires more than 65 watts of juice, the Aukey Omnia PA-B5 is your best bet. This super-svelte charger can not only hit its rated 100-watt output capacity but, in our tests, it exceeded that number by more than 10%, delivering 113.7 watts (19.6V / 5.8A), which is more than the USB-PD standard even supports. Our experienced technical support staff is available to answer any questions regarding your genuine Dell-branded parts upgrade.Now you might think, why are those words wrong when they are in the current vocabulary. There are two important reasons: Genuine Dell-branded parts mean that you will not need to worry about voiding your system’s hardware warranty. I love how the charger has additional "A"&"C" ports that will independently support up to 30w of charging capability so that someone else in the car can charge their device simultaneously. I have no tested the charger with all 3 ports consumed at the same time so I can't comment on if the charger splits the wattage on the 30w ports, but I imagine it probably does just due to limitations. My only critique of this chargers is that it is has a somewhat tall profile and can wiggle a little if forced, but odds are this won't bother anyone too much. Even with the wiggle it does not interrupt it's primary power connection to the vehicle. All in all, this is a great charger! RAVPower Pioneer 61W (RP-PC112 ): This 61-watt charger isn’t as small as the Aukey Omnia PA-B2, but it gets significantly warmer after 20 minutes running at 59 watts. It can hit a full 69.48 watts for a time, but it can’t sustain that wattage and will shut down before 20 minutes have passed.

Dell USB-C 130 W AC Adapter with 1meter Power Cord - United Dell USB-C 130 W AC Adapter with 1meter Power Cord - United

For a compact car charger, there are a lot of things to like about this, but I think there is room for a few key improvements as well.B) Because they are wrong, even though they are in the dictionary. The best explanation is to compare these with some other more known ones. For instance lets take temperature, temperature is expressed in Kelvin, Celsius or Fahrenheit. You don't say it's 23 temperature today, no temperature is what you are talking about and you can measure it compared to a reference, for example: "it's 300 Kelvin" is a valid expression. No lets say we have two objects with a different temperature. You can say object A has a lower or higher temperature than B, or you could even tell the exact temperature expressed in one of the usual units. But you never would say, object A has a higher Kelvinage then B, or Fahrenheitage or Celsiusage, that sounds ridiculous doesn't it?