It’s better in this regard than any of my other favourites: the Swarovski Habicht Porros in 8x30, 7x42 and 10x40; the Leica Ultravid HD 7x42, and; the Zeiss Victory FL 7x42 There are locations in the Bay Area where, for all the tea in China, I would not want to live. Your location must be terrible. Sorry to hear that. However, if you are loving the ones you have I very much doubt that you would see any significant difference with either of the Celestrons. They are around 2x the price of yours, so one would hope they are better quality, but build quality may not translate into significantly better views. Also, they may not be as bright as yours anyway due to transmission losses, which can be higher in roof prisms binos compared to porros at a similar cost point.

binoculars are best used during the day as well as in low light. They produce brighter images and add great detail due to the 10x magnification power. If you’re willing to pay a little more as well as add a few grams to the instrument’s body. This should be your go-to! Firstly, I see that review is quite a few years old, so I'm not sure if yours would be the same as the older ones. Have you done the same tests for true aperture and magnification? They are easy to do. really deteriorating near the field stop. Much of this off-axis unsharpness is just field curvature, but there is some astigmatismThe simple answer is that larger lenses require more glass and more material to manufacture. However, this may not be the only reason for the price difference. If you want extra aperture, why not keep the ones you are happy with and look for a nice 70 or 80mm bino?

It depend too much how much time you want to keep them tripod mounted, if you plan to mount most time and live at light polluted place would choose the 12X50, if you plan to use hadheld and have acess to better quality skyes would prefer the wide field of 10X50 For instance, during the day in normal light conditions, a pair of 10x42 binoculars are able to capture and transmit enough light to your eyes for a bright, high-quality image, and thus, under these conditions, you would not be able to differentiate between the image quality of a 10x42, 10x50, and 12x50 binoculars. Montane Women’s Tucana Pants are a wardrobe staple for year-round comfort whilst walking and exploring

I have an EL SV 12x50, and of all my binoculars it has the greatest ‘wow’ factor - every time I first use it of a day, I’m both amazed and delighted by the image The Nikon Action EX 12x50 is a great value combination of high power and light-gathering. If you really want to get closer to objects then look for binoculars with 16x magnification – and prepare to always use a tripod – but we think 12x is both a worthy upgrade from 10x binoculars without hugely adding to the weight.

Well, you are right that if I measure the outside aperture of my 12x60s with a ruler it will come out at 60mm. But from shining a laser through the eyepiece of them and measuring how the disk of light that comes out the aperture I get 54mm. So there is an internal baffle. As for the exit pupil figure, I measured mine at 4.5mm which is what it should if I've only really got 12x54s. So honesty in one area and not so much in another.Binoculars are some of the most frequently used optical instruments. These devices are handheld and are designed to provide a magnified and enhanced view of distant objects. Essentially, a pair of binoculars is two small telescopes mounted on a single frame. Good binoculars are carefully aligned with lenses that reduce glare. Usually, binoculars with larger lenses, such as 10x50 and 12x50 are more expensive than the alternative 10x42 binoculars. The question remains why?

Therefore, when there is plenty of light, your pupils constrict to a size smaller than the exit pupil on 10x42, 10x50, and 12x50 binoculars and resulting in you perceiving more light for a bright view.The cost of binoculars mostly depends on the brand, what price range of binoculars you are looking for and where you are shopping at but in general, the price difference tends to be between 5% to 20% more for 10x50 and 12x50 compared to the alternative 10x42. I have a pair of Oberwerk 12x60 LW binoculars that I bought last year and love them! Especially since I can handhold them at 2.5#. But in this Cloudy Nights review, the author found that his pair was basically operating at 11.5x50mm. And that has got me to wondering if I could get more from a pair of Celestron 12x50s or Celestron 12x56s considering that they are truly the size they are listed as! So does anybody have on opinion on if I should stay away from the 12x56s and go instead for the 12x50s? I have a feeling that the 12x50 are better quality, but that extra aperture (and thus exit pupil) is really tempting. Slightly more powerful than most large binoculars and nicely priced, the Nikon Action EX 12x50 are impressive and good value. We had a lot of success with these binoculars during the night and day, but they are more substantial than most rivals. Their extra bulk may put a lot of potential users off, but the 12x magnification is worth it if you want to get closer-in to distant objects and animals. The legendary EL wrap-around grip guarantees maximum comfort and steadiness when observing, even over long periods of time. The Nikon Action EX 12x50 porro prism binoculars are a relatively rare example of a 12x50 product, but there are others to choose from. The Celestron Nature DX ED 12x50 binoculars may seem virtually identical, but they use the more compact roof prism design that also allows a closer focus – just 2m / 6.5ft distant. For a slightly different specification, which is also more affordable and ideal for all-round use, consider the Celestron UpClose G2 10x50 porro prism binoculars. Nikon Action EX 12x50 binoculars review: verdict